Download current in-work version here:

http://www.mtnsys.com/faq-fcb/PCEditor.htm

Ed

--- In fcb1010_uno@..., "Virgilio C. Ataide"
<virgilioat@y...> wrote:

I would!!!!! hehe

Virgilio




--- edwardtdixon <eddixon@m...> wrote:

Would you be interested in testing the updated
version?

Ed

--- In fcb1010_uno@..., "Mike Riley"
<the-bug@a...> wrote:

Yep.

Of course, much of that information has not

changed - just new bits

used.

Keep in mind, those are memory addresses listed in

my document -
not

sysex byte locations. I found the data easier to

visualize
after "7/8-

unpacked."

mike riley

--- In fcb1010_uno@..., "edwardtdixon"

<eddixon@m...>

wrote:

Looks like key data on UnO version info and

things like stompbox

mode

are stored around positions x2026-2033.

Ed

Yahoo! Groups Links


fcb1010_uno-unsubscribe@...

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

I would!!!!! hehe

Virgilio




--- edwardtdixon <eddixon@...> wrote:

Would you be interested in testing the updated
version?

Ed

--- In fcb1010_uno@..., "Mike Riley"
<the-bug@a...> wrote:

Yep.

Of course, much of that information has not

changed - just new bits

used.

Keep in mind, those are memory addresses listed in

my document -
not

sysex byte locations. I found the data easier to

visualize
after "7/8-

unpacked."

mike riley

--- In fcb1010_uno@..., "edwardtdixon"

<eddixon@m...>

wrote:

Looks like key data on UnO version info and

things like stompbox

mode

are stored around positions x2026-2033.

Ed

Yahoo! Groups Links


fcb1010_uno-unsubscribe@...

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Would you be interested in testing the updated version?

Ed

--- In fcb1010_uno@..., "Mike Riley" <the-bug@a...> wrote:

Yep.

Of course, much of that information has not changed - just new bits
used.

Keep in mind, those are memory addresses listed in my document -

not

sysex byte locations. I found the data easier to visualize

after "7/8-

unpacked."

mike riley

--- In fcb1010_uno@..., "edwardtdixon" <eddixon@m...>
wrote:

Looks like key data on UnO version info and things like stompbox

mode

are stored around positions x2026-2033.

Ed

Yep.

Of course, much of that information has not changed - just new bits
used.

Keep in mind, those are memory addresses listed in my document - not
sysex byte locations. I found the data easier to visualize after "7/8-
unpacked."

mike riley

--- In fcb1010_uno@..., "edwardtdixon" <eddixon@m...>
wrote:

Looks like key data on UnO version info and things like stompbox

mode

are stored around positions x2026-2033.

Ed

Looks like key data on UnO version info and things like stompbox mode
are stored around positions x2026-2033.

Ed

Got it.

Thanks... Ed

Ed,

I forgot to mention...

Within that document, all the "new" stuff is marked with "UnO" in the
right-most column...

Ed,

There are significant changes within the global section.

Within the existing preset section, some formerly spare bits are now
used, and some of the bytes have secondary purposes.

And, the old "spare" bytes starting at memory address 1600 (0x640)
are now used; four bytes per preset.

Check out:

http://www.ripwerx.com/sysex-to-mem_xref.pdf

I Think it's all there. Let me know if I can help...

mike riley



--- In fcb1010_uno@..., "edwardtdixon" <eddixon@m...>
wrote:

Hve the new chip and want to make some changes to my FCB Editor
software to work with the new chip and features. I there summary

info

on what changed in the MIDI dump?

Ed

Hve the new chip and want to make some changes to my FCB Editor
software to work with the new chip and features. I there summary info
on what changed in the MIDI dump?

Ed